Authors:
frasolo
ibourke

TestDox

Products: IntelliJ IDEA

Vendor: Ian Bourke, Franck Rasolo

Website: http://testdox.codehaus.org

Source code: http://svn.codehaus.org/testdox/

License: http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Bugtracker page

Forum page

Provides enhanced navigation and live documentation for unit tested code. Never write a badly named test again!
Downloads: 24183
Rating:
Participated in rating: 6
Version Compatible builds Date
1.1.15 117.84 15.05.2014 Download
1.1.14 (IDEA X) 90.116 22.02.2011 Download
1.1.12 (Diana) 80.8823 — 85.* 18.02.2009 Download
1.1.10 (Selena) 72.7361 — 75.7999 02.10.2008 Download
1.1.7 (Demetra) 55.5755 — 60.6500 30.09.2007 Download
1.1.4 (Irida) 50.4155 — 55.5700 03.08.2006 Download
1.1.3 (Pallada) 40.2079 — 40.2500 01.10.2005 Download
1.1.3 (Aurora) 40.1100 — 40.2000 01.10.2005 Download
6 updates are hidden show all updates

Recent change notes

Bugs Fixed:
 -  TESTDOX-30 - Set default test naming scheme to @Test for JUnit 4 and TestNG

Minimal Requirements:
IntelliJ IDEA 12 running on Java 1.6

Comments:

ORFJackal
2008-11-18 01:14:00
Does not work well with other testing frameworks, even if they are based on JUnit. For example it does not recognize JDave's (http://www.jdave.org/) tests at all. The plugin should find the test methods based on the tests run by IDEA, and not by some naming conventions.
.
Anonymous
2008-05-07 00:26:08
Support for JUnit 4.0?
.
Anonymous
2008-05-07 00:25:39
Support for JUnit 4.0?
.
Anonymous
2008-02-12 12:54:46
I can't create test class..
i am using IntelliJ IDEA 7.0.2 ..
plz help, with steps to create ,run test
.
bonski
Rated:
2007-05-30 14:43:21
My favorite plugin.
.
amohombe2
Rated:
2006-05-26 17:08:43
to Anonymous:
- yes it might be a problem that they overlap and not "complement" eachother(that would be in an ideal world)
- it is indeed confusing (I was confused myself too).
- it requires many improvements (well, what plug-in does not?)

but, NO, it should not be only one test plug-in: concurrence is very healty.

IMHO the Struts plug-ins are the best example for this. They solved this by making a comparison matrix, so IMHO this is exactly what the test plug-ins also need, to avoid confusion and clarify things:
http://www.intellij.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/StrutsPluginsFeaturesOverview

So IMHO because:
- this plug-in has all the fields filled
- it comes with sources, so everyone can participate in improving it.
- the authors respond very fast (not like those from other plug-ins)
- to encourrage them keep up the good work and improve it further,

This plug-in deserves IMHO the maximum rating possible.
.
Anonymous
Rated:
2006-05-25 18:38:19
Been using Testdox plugin for a long time. It's one of those tools that 'Just works'.
.
Anonymous
Rated:
2006-05-16 14:32:19
I don't consider this plug-in deserves the highest ranking possible. It needs much work and better integration into the IDE. For now it's presence into the IDE its too "invasive".
It is also very bad that there are so many "test" plug-ins that have partially overlapping features, confusing strongly the user. There should be only one test plug-in, but that should be good.
Maybe after many improvements ...
.
ibryson
Rated:
2006-04-16 07:49:04
Excellent plugin which is invaluable when working with unit tests. Especially useful for it's test navigation and test creation features.
.
frasolo
Rated:
2006-04-16 07:49:04
Yes, I co-wrote it but I also use it every day both at work and on other projects.
.